Insight Turkey
Insight Turkey
Challenging ideas
On Turkish politics and International affairs

Insight Turkey > Articles |

Reflections of the Palestinian-Israeli War in Western Media: The Case of Thomson Reuters

The Palestinian-Israeli conflict has long been a central issue in the Middle East, with global resonance and significant media reflections. Western media often claim neutrality, but are criticized for ignoring power imbalances and presenting news largely from an Israel-centric perspective, highlighting Israel’s security concerns while downplaying Palestinian suffering. International media organizations play a key role in shaping global perceptions, yet ownership and control are concentrated in Western companies, which shape news policies based on political, ideological, and cultural values. This study examines how Thomson Reuters, one of the world’s most influential international news agencies, covered the Palestinian-Israeli war beginning on October 7, 2023. Using content analysis, news published between October 7, 2023, and January 7, 2024, were analyzed in terms of language, themes, visuals, tone, and emphasis. Findings highlight the role of media ownership and reveal how Western-origin international media shape narratives on Middle Eastern conflicts, contributing to future research on war journalism and media studies.

Reflections of the Palestinian-Israeli War in Western Media The Case
 

 

 

 

A Historical Perspective on Palestinian-Israeli Conflict

 

In the literature of international relations, there are numerous perspectives on the origins of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Some articles focus on the prolonged wars over the lands considered sacred by both Jews and Muslims, while others emphasize the Arab-Israeli conflicts over the last 75 years since the establishment of Israel.1 Although the roots of the Arab-Israeli conflict extend back in time, its escalation originates from tensions between Jewish settlers and local Arab residents in the early 20th century. The publication of the Balfour Declaration by the British government in 1917, which supported the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine, and the establishment of the British mandate over Palestine in 1920 following World War I, intensified the conflict between the parties. The intermittent conflicts that continued until 1947 took on a new dimension with the adoption of UN General Assembly Resolution 181.2 The partition of the Palestinian territories into two states by the 1947 Partition Plan did not provide a lasting solution; instead, it became a catalyst for conflict. The 1948 Arab-Israeli War, which began with the establishment of the State of Israel, was an inevitable result of the longstanding hostilities and tensions between Zionism and Arab Nationalism.3 The war, which concluded in 1949 with Israel’s victory, had significant consequences not only for regional politics but also for international relations.4 Following the war, Israel expanded its territories beyond the boundaries set by the UN Partition Plan, while the Palestinian territories were occupied by Israel, Jordan (West Bank), and Egypt (Gaza Strip). While Israel, having declared its independence in 1948, became a state with internationally recognized borders, Palestine had to struggle for recognition as a nation. Alongside this legal imbalance between Israel and Palestine, the issue of Palestinian refugees, which emerged after the 1948 War, also awaited resolution.5

Already have an account? Sign In.
Print Subscription
4 Print Issues
Subscribe
Digital Subscription
4 Digital Issues
Subscribe
Premium Subscription
4 Print Issues
4 Digital Issues
Subscribe

Labels »  

We use cookies in a limited and restricted manner for specific purposes. For more details, you can see "our data policy". More...